Updated August 2026
    File Transfer
    Crowded · 74/100

    copyparty vs qBittorrent: the maintained-project comparison

    The two leading open-source file transfer projects, compared on the signals that predict whether a dependency survives: commit cadence, release history, licence and health.

    TL;DR • copyparty vs qBittorrent • as of August 2026

    copyparty is the safer default: actively maintained maintenance, 773 commits in the last twelve months and a health score of 94/100, against 461 commits and 87/100 for qBittorrent. Licence still decides the commercial question — copyparty ships under MIT, qBittorrent under GPL-2.0. Both are File Transfer projects; the category scores 74/100 on saturation with 58 open-source implementations tracked.

    Side-by-side comparison

    Metric copyparty qBittorrent
    GitHub stars 46k 39k
    Maintenance status Actively maintained Actively maintained
    Commits (12 months) 773 461
    Commits (3 months) 105 141
    Active months / 12 12 12
    Last commit 2026-08-15 2026-08-15
    Last release 2026-08-03 2026-07-07
    Licence MIT GPL-2.0
    Licence family permissive copyleft
    Health score 94/100 87/100
    Replaces
    Repository 9001/copyparty qbittorrent/qbittorrent

    Repository metadata refreshed August 2026. Stars never decay — read the maintenance rows first.

    The verdict

    copyparty

    Safer default

    Portable file server with accelerated resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, zeroconf, media indexer, video thumbnails, audio transcoding, and write-only folders, in a single file with no mand

    • Licence: MIT
    • Status: Actively maintained
    • Health: 94/100

    qBittorrent

    Free cross-platform bittorrent client with a feature rich Web UI for remote access.

    • Licence: GPL-2.0
    • Status: Actively maintained
    • Health: 87/100

    copyparty vs qBittorrent: what people ask

    Is copyparty better than qBittorrent?

    On maintenance signals, copyparty leads: 773 commits in the last twelve months across 12 active months, versus 461 commits and 12 active months for qBittorrent. Star counts (46k vs 39k) reflect historical popularity, not current health, so read them second.

    Which of copyparty and qBittorrent can I use in a commercial product?

    copyparty is licensed under MIT (permissive) and qBittorrent under GPL-2.0 (copyleft). Permissive licences (MIT, Apache, BSD) allow closed commercial products. Copyleft (GPL) triggers on distribution and AGPL triggers on network use, which covers SaaS. Source-available licences usually forbid competing hosted services outright.

    Is qBittorrent abandoned?

    qBittorrent is marked actively maintained with its last commit recorded 2026-08-15 and 141 commits in the last three months. It still qualifies as having momentum, so it is a viable dependency.

    Should I build a paid alternative to copyparty and qBittorrent?

    The File Transfer category is rated crowded at 74/100, with 28 maintained implementations. In a crowded category every prospect can find a free version in minutes, so your wedge has to be something maintainers structurally will not build: compliance, SLAs, managed scale or a workflow they reject.

    Building in file transfer?

    Two maintained free tools already own this category. IdeaProof scores your idea against live competitors, market size and 1,000+ documented failures in about two minutes.

    Validate your idea free

    Open source competition: common questions

    How do I know if my startup idea already exists as open source?

    Search this database by category and by the commercial product you would replace. It covers 1665 projects across 130 categories, each mapped to the paid tool it substitutes. If your category shows a "Crowded" verdict, a maintained free version almost certainly exists and your positioning has to account for it.

    Does an open-source alternative mean I should not build my product?

    No. It means free is your price anchor. Plenty of large companies were built next to a good open-source project — the ones that failed were the ones selling the same job at a price the free tool made indefensible. Find the part of the job the project deliberately does not do, and sell that.

    What does the saturation score mean?

    Each category gets a 0–100 score built from three inputs: how many implementations exist, what share of them are still actively maintained, and how far ahead the leading project is compared with the category median. 62+ is Crowded, 38–61 Contested, under 38 Open. 11 categories are Crowded and 88 are Open.